Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 16 — Commercial Practices · Part 802 — Exemption Rules · § 802.50

§ 802.50. Acquisitions of foreign assets.

524 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t16/s§ 802.50·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)The acquisition of assets located outside the United States shall be exempt from the requirements of the act unless the foreign assets the acquiring person would hold as a result of the acquisition generated sales in or into the U.S. exceeding \$50 million (as adjusted) during the acquired person's most recent fiscal year.
(b)Where the foreign assets being acquired exceed the threshold in paragraph
(a)of this section, the acquisition nevertheless shall be exempt where:
(1)Both acquiring and acquired persons are foreign;
(2)The aggregate sales of the acquiring and acquired persons in or into the United States are less than \$110 million (as adjusted) in their respective most recent fiscal years;
(3)The aggregate total assets of the acquiring and acquired persons located in the United States (other than investment assets, voting or nonvoting securities of another person, and assets included pursuant to § 801.40(d)(2) of this chapter) are less than \$110 million (as adjusted); and
(4)The transaction does not meet the criteria of Section 7A(a)(2)(A). Example to § 802.50:1. Assume that "A" and "B" are both U.S. persons. "A" proposes selling to "B" a manufacturing plant located abroad. Sales in or into the United States attributable to the plant totaled \$13 million in the most recent fiscal year. The transaction is exempt under this paragraph
(a)of this section. 2. Sixty days after the transaction in example 1, "A" proposes to sell to "B" a second manufacturing plant located abroad; sales in or into the United States attributable to this plant, when combined with the sales into the United States of the first plant, totaled in excess of \$50 million (as adjusted) in the most recent fiscal year. Since "B" would be acquiring the second plant within 180 days of the first plant, both plants would be considered assets of "A" held by "B" as a result of the second acquisition (see § 801.13(b)(2) of this chapter). Since the total sales in or into the United States exceed \$50 million (as adjusted), the acquisition of the second plant would not be exempt under this paragraph
(a)of this section. 3. Assume that "A" and "B" are foreign persons with aggregate sales in or into the United States of in excess of \$110 million (as adjusted). If "A" acquires only foreign assets of "B," and if those assets generated \$50 million (as adjusted) or less in sales in or into the United States, the transaction is exempt. 4. Assume that "A" and "B" are foreign persons with aggregate sales in or into the United States and assets located in the United Sates of less than \$110 million (as adjusted). If "A" acquires only foreign assets of "B," and those assets generated in excess of \$50 million (as adjusted) in sales in or into the United States during the most recent fiscal year, the transaction is exempt from reporting if the assets are valued at \$200 million (as adjusted) or less, but is reportable if valued at greater than \$200 million (as adjusted). ``` ``` \[67 FR 11903, Mar. 18, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 4995, Jan. 31, 2005\]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.